Microsoft Build 2025: Accelerating Scientific Discovery with AI

Reading Time: 9 minutes

Prefer watching instead of reading? Watch the video here. Prefer reading instead? Scroll down for the full text. Prefer listening instead? Scroll up for the audio player.

P.S. The video and audio are in sync, so you can switch between them or control playback as needed. Enjoy Greyhound Standpoint insights in the format that suits you best. Join the conversation on social media using #GreyhoundStandpoint.

---

For all the talk about AI transforming work, one domain has remained curiously underserved: scientific discovery. While enterprises have deployed copilots for email, code, and customer support, the research lab — whether pharmaceutical, materials, energy, or biotech — has lagged behind. That changed at Microsoft Build 2025, where the company introduced Microsoft Discovery, a platform purpose-built to accelerate the R&D process using agentic AI.

The premise is bold: what if the traditional research workflow — hypothesis, experimentation, validation, publication — could be transformed into an AI-powered discovery loop? Not a pipeline of disconnected tasks, but a feedback-driven system where agents assist researchers in literature mining, data synthesis, experiment design, and even peer collaboration. Microsoft isn’t just aiming to speed up research. It wants to reshape how knowledge is explored, organized, and operationalized across domains.

This marks a significant shift. In most enterprise settings, AI has been applied to efficiency — automate a task, streamline a workflow, reduce a queue. But in R&D, the real goal isn’t efficiency. It’s insight. And insight is messy. It emerges from pattern recognition, creative leaps, contradictory data, and institutional knowledge buried in PDFs, emails, lab reports, and legacy systems.

By introducing a platform specifically tuned for discovery, Microsoft is acknowledging that AI in the sciences can’t be a copy-paste of AI in enterprise operations. It requires different models, different interfaces, and different levels of domain alignment. Microsoft Discovery is their answer — a stack that combines large language models, graph intelligence, domain-specific datasets, and agentic reasoning into a platform that doesn’t just summarize, but helps scientists think.

Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 shows growing momentum behind this shift: 53 percent of enterprise R&D leaders now say GenAI could be more transformative for discovery than for automation — provided the tools understand the rigor, risk, and reproducibility demands of their work. And 61 percent say their current AI investments don’t support early-stage exploration at all.

A Greyhound Fieldnote from the CTO of a European life sciences firm framed the need with clarity: We don’t need AI to write another email. We need AI to help us solve for unknowns — questions with no answer in the database yet. That’s discovery.

Greyhound Standpoint: At Greyhound Research, we believe Microsoft’s entry into this space signals a critical broadening of the GenAI conversation. It’s no longer just about workplace productivity. It’s about scientific progress. And if Discovery delivers, it could mark the beginning of a new era where the bottlenecks in research aren’t technical, but epistemic — and AI helps us push through them.

What Is Microsoft Discovery — and Why Does It Matter Now?

Microsoft Discovery isn’t a rebrand, a toolkit, or a generic AI overlay. It’s a purpose-built platform designed to bring agentic intelligence into the research and development lifecycle — from literature review to lab report. At its core, Microsoft Discovery aims to reimagine how scientists and researchers interact with information, design experiments, evaluate results, and collaborate across disciplines.

Rather than positioning itself as a catch-all copilot, Microsoft has architected Discovery as a layered intelligence stack. It brings together foundation models trained on scientific literature, domain-specific embeddings, graph reasoning capabilities, and multi-agent orchestration — all wrapped in a secure, enterprise-grade environment. In short, it’s not just an LLM with a lab coat. It’s a coordinated system that understands scientific workflows and operates within the boundaries that real-world R&D demands.

One of Discovery’s defining traits is how it handles ambiguity. Traditional enterprise AI focuses on extracting answers. But in science, the questions are often more important than the conclusions. Discovery supports that reality by enabling agents to explore contradictory sources, flag uncertainty, and track evolving hypotheses. This isn’t just summarization at scale — it’s structured curiosity.

Another major distinction is Discovery’s support for multimodal inputs. Research rarely lives in a single format. Findings are scattered across PDFs, journal articles, images, charts, simulations, databases, emails, and internal wikis. Discovery is designed to ingest and synthesize from all of them — treating context, structure, and source fidelity as first-class priorities. That’s essential in fields like pharma and materials science, where nuance often determines viability.

According to Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025, 58 percent of R&D teams in the Global 2000 have already experimented with GenAI for tasks like summarizing papers or generating hypotheses — but 47 percent say those efforts plateaued due to poor domain alignment, lack of reproducibility, or security concerns. Discovery is Microsoft’s attempt to go deeper — to embed agentic intelligence into the core of how science gets done, not just how it gets written about.

A Greyhound Fieldnote from the Head of Innovation at a US-based energy company put it this way: Every AI vendor wants to help with documentation. But real R&D lives upstream — where the questions are messy, and the answers aren’t obvious. That’s where we need help.

Greyhound Standpoint: At Greyhound Research, we see Discovery not as an incremental tool, but as the early scaffolding of what could become a new computing category: intelligence infrastructure for science. It’s a quiet but crucial evolution. Because for enterprises built on IP, breakthrough thinking isn’t a bonus. It’s the business model.

Agentic Workflows for Scientists: Beyond Search, Into Reasoning

If Microsoft Discovery only offered faster ways to search through papers, it would be useful — but not transformative. What makes it noteworthy is its push into reasoning. Discovery isn’t just retrieving content. It’s helping researchers ask better questions, surface blind spots, and construct workflows that mimic how real scientific exploration unfolds.

This shift from search to reasoning is central to the platform’s identity. Traditional tools give you snippets. Discovery gives you synthesis — and not just in the academic sense. Its agents are designed to operate across chained steps: summarizing findings, cross-referencing previous studies, suggesting experimental methods, identifying contradictory data, and even recommending collaborators or grants based on project scope. This is not automation for clerical tasks. It’s augmentation for intellectual effort.

The core innovation here lies in how Discovery treats workflows as dynamic, revisable narratives. A scientist can start with a loose hypothesis, and Discovery’s agents can evolve the inquiry — iterating through literature, surfacing methodologically relevant studies, and highlighting where the evidence thins out. The agent isn’t just answering. It’s thinking alongside the researcher, with traceability, domain alignment, and memory built in.

Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 confirms this demand: 55 percent of enterprise R&D leaders now prioritize AI systems that enable iterative knowledge work over static output generation. They’re not looking for copilots that complete sentences. They’re looking for thinking partners that can persist across cycles of exploration, failure, and refinement.

A Greyhound Fieldnote from a Chief Scientist at a global biotech firm captured the shift: It’s not about getting the right answer fast. It’s about testing ten wrong ones efficiently. That’s where real scientific acceleration happens.

Microsoft’s approach with Discovery also leans into agentic modularity. Instead of one monolithic model pretending to know everything, Discovery orchestrates multiple domain-aware agents, each optimized for a specific role — from literature analysis to simulation guidance to grant discovery. This composability makes it easier for R&D teams to plug into existing environments without overhauling their stack.

Greyhound Standpoint: At Greyhound Research, we believe this is the critical differentiator. Most GenAI tools stop at summarization. Discovery goes further — into insight orchestration. It allows enterprises to treat their research infrastructure not as a filing cabinet, but as an evolving system of record. One that reasons, not just recalls.

AI Meets the Lab Bench: Trust, Replicability, and Enterprise Integration

Scientific discovery isn’t just about what can be explored — it’s about what can be trusted, reproduced, and eventually productized. And that’s where most GenAI tools hit a wall. They generate insights without attribution, hallucinate facts, and leave behind a trail of outputs that can’t survive peer review, much less regulatory scrutiny. Microsoft Discovery approaches this differently. It brings AI to the lab bench with traceability, reproducibility, and enterprise-grade integration baked in.

Every step taken by Discovery’s agents is logged and attributed. Sources are linked. Reasoning paths are explainable. And when insights emerge, they are tied back to the data, models, and documents that shaped them. This is not only critical for scientific integrity — it’s essential for industries operating under regulation, from pharma to aerospace to chemicals. If an AI-suggested formulation can’t be audited, it can’t be shipped.

What stands out in Discovery’s approach is its deep integration with existing enterprise systems. It’s not asking researchers to abandon their tools. It’s designed to sit alongside lab information management systems (LIMS), knowledge bases, SharePoint archives, and internal data lakes — pulling insight across silos rather than forcing unification. This hybrid architecture gives enterprises the confidence to experiment with GenAI in sensitive domains without compromising workflow fidelity or data security.

Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 data shows 62 percent of R&D executives say the biggest gap in current GenAI tooling is not capability — it’s validation. AI can generate hypotheses, but without source-level visibility and reproducibility controls, the results often can’t be trusted. Microsoft Discovery aims to solve this with agentic scaffolding that remembers where each insight came from, and why it was suggested in the first place.

One Greyhound Fieldnote from the Global Head of R&D at a consumer healthcare giant made the stakes clear: If we’re going to use AI to develop new ingredients, it needs to be able to show its work. Not just what it found — but how it found it.

What Microsoft is building here is more than an assistant. It’s an infrastructure of trust — one that blends AI flexibility with scientific discipline. It respects the cycles of experimentation and failure that define real-world research. And it understands that in the enterprise, the distance between a hypothesis and a product is paved with audit logs, compliance reviews, and reproducible design.

Greyhound Standpoint: At Greyhound Research, we see this focus on trust and interoperability as essential. AI in the lab can’t be treated like AI in the inbox. It must explain, repeat, and integrate — or risk being dismissed as just another hype layer. Microsoft Discovery is staking its claim as something more durable.

The Future of Innovation Infrastructure: R&D as an AI-Native Discipline

If there’s one theme that ties together Microsoft Discovery and the broader announcements at Build 2025, it’s this: GenAI is no longer just a tool. It’s becoming infrastructure. And nowhere is that shift more profound — or more overdue — than in research and development.

Traditionally, R&D has been treated as an island. Separate tools, separate metrics, separate systems — often disconnected from the rest of the enterprise technology stack. Discovery changes that. By making R&D workflows agentic, composable, and integrated from day one, Microsoft is repositioning innovation as a native function of enterprise architecture — not a siloed pursuit of lone scientists or isolated labs.

This has deep implications. It means that the innovation pipeline can now be instrumented, observed, and optimized like any other enterprise process. It means hypotheses can be tracked with the same fidelity as customer tickets or manufacturing inputs. And it means that research breakthroughs no longer have to live at the fringe of IT governance — they can exist inside the same framework that manages risk, compliance, and delivery across the business.

According to Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025, 68 percent of global CIOs now believe that R&D will become one of the top three enterprise domains transformed by GenAI — not because of automation, but because of acceleration. Acceleration in cycle times. In discovery rates. In time to market. But none of that is sustainable without platforms that treat scientific thinking with the same seriousness as operational execution.

A Greyhound Fieldnote from the Innovation Lead at a global manufacturing conglomerate made the case: We’re not trying to replace researchers. We’re trying to give them systems that remember, reason, and respond. That’s how we scale what we already do well — not reinvent it from scratch.

With Discovery, Microsoft isn’t offering magic. It’s offering muscle — computational, contextual, and collaborative. It’s turning AI from a curiosity into a collaborator. And in doing so, it’s giving enterprises a way to turn knowledge into motion.

Greyhound Standpoint: At Greyhound Research, we believe this moment signals something deeper than a new product launch. It marks the formal entrance of GenAI into the heart of the innovation economy. From scientific labs to enterprise R&D centers, the message is clear: the future of discovery is not just faster. It’s AI-native by design.

Copyright Policy. All content contained on the Greyhound Research website is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or broadcast without the prior written permission of Greyhound Research or, in the case of third-party materials, the prior written consent of the copyright owner of that content. You may not alter, delete, obscure, or conceal any trademark, copyright, or other notice appearing in any Greyhound Research content. We request our readers not to copy Greyhound Research content and not republish or redistribute them (in whole or partially) via emails or republishing them in any media, including websites, newsletters, or intranets. We understand that you may want to share this content with others, so we’ve added tools under each content piece that allow you to share the content. If you have any questions, please get in touch with our Community Relations Team at connect@thofgr.com.