Google and Wiz: Why AI-Native Security Will Redefine Multi-Cloud Trust

Reading Time: 13 minutes

Prefer watching instead of reading? Watch the video here. Prefer reading instead? Scroll down for the full text. Prefer listening instead? Scroll up for the audio player.

P.S. The video and audio are in sync, so you can switch between them or control playback as needed. Enjoy Greyhound Standpoint insights in the format that suits you best. Join the conversation on social media using #GreyhoundStandpoint.

---

Over the past decade, I’ve watched Google’s enterprise play unfold like a chess match—deliberate, sometimes hesitant, and often overshadowed by its rivals. But this latest move? It’s a declaration. On March 18, 2025, Google announced a seismic acquisition: a USD 32 billion all-cash buyout of Wiz, an Israeli-born cloud security unicorn that’s gone from stealth to stardom in under five years. It’s not just Google’s biggest acquisition ever—it’s arguably its most strategic in the enterprise domain.

Why? Because the rules of the cloud game are changing. Enterprises are no longer seduced by cost savings or speed alone. Today, the conversation has pivoted to resilience, risk, and regulation. Cloud isn’t just infrastructure anymore—it’s the new control plane. And in this landscape, security is the language of trust.

Wiz, built by former Microsoft security engineers, didn’t just ride the wave—it created one. With its agentless architecture, real-time threat detection, and ability to cut across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and even Oracle, it carved out a new category of cloud-native, AI-first security. In acquiring Wiz, Google isn’t just catching up to AWS and Microsoft—it’s outflanking them in the one domain that CIOs, CISOs, and boards now value above all else: proactive, autonomous, cross-cloud security.

At Greyhound Research, we believe this acquisition is not just about bolstering Google’s product portfolio—it marks a strategic redrawing of power in the cloud ecosystem. In acquiring Wiz, Google is asserting itself as the architect of a new cloud security paradigm, one where trust, control, and competitiveness are redefined at the security layer.

Strategic Intent – What Google Is Really Buying

At first glance, Google’s USD 32 billion acquisition of Wiz appears to be about strengthening cloud security. However, to frame it simply as a product enhancement would be a gross underestimation. What Google is really buying is strategic proximity—to risk-aware CIOs, to multi-cloud architecture decisions, and to the future of AI-powered cybersecurity itself.

This isn’t a plug-and-play security tool—it’s a force multiplier. Wiz gives Google three things it has long struggled to command at once: credibility in regulated industries, currency in multi-cloud conversations, and clout in proactive enterprise-grade security. Wiz’s agentless architecture and rapid threat detection are designed for environments where zero trust isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a baseline expectation. With native support across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Oracle Cloud, Wiz is one of the rare platforms that can claim true neutrality in an increasingly territorial cloud landscape.

At Greyhound Research, we’ve heard this loud and clear in field conversations, which we call Greyhound Fieldnotes. As one banking CIO in Singapore told us, “Wiz has been on our shortlist for a year—not because it’s flashy, but because it just works across everything. The Google deal will only push it further into board-level discussions.”

Strategically, Wiz aligns perfectly with Google’s broader Anthos strategy—a proposition built around embracing, not resisting, multi-cloud and hybrid realities. While AWS pushes for platform lock-in and Microsoft leverages M365 synergies, Google’s bet is on coexistence, control, and now, security visibility across environments it doesn’t own.

Wiz’s valuation isn’t merely a reflection of technical merit—it’s a bet on velocity. In scaling to over USD 500 million in ARR within just four years, Wiz has become a credibility engine for Google in segments where trust must be earned, not marketed. At Greyhound Research, we believe Google isn’t just acquiring capability—it’s acquiring momentum. The speed of customer adoption, particularly in BFSI and healthcare, signals a strong market pull that Google can now convert into platform stickiness.

This move also consolidates Google’s layered buildout of a comprehensive security portfolio. With Mandiant (incident response), Chronicle (SIEM), VirusTotal (malware analysis), and Security Command Center (visibility), Wiz becomes the connective tissue—binding these units into a more unified and intelligent cloud security framework. The common thread? An AI-first philosophy that puts automation, anomaly detection, and real-time remediation at the heart of the offering.

Beyond cloud posture management, Wiz also strengthens Google’s reach into endpoint protection and SOC orchestration. Coupled with Chronicle and VirusTotal, it opens the door for a single, end-to-end response pipeline—from detection to enrichment to mitigation—without jumping between disparate toolsets. This positions Google to challenge not just hyperscalers but also security specialists like SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex, and Microsoft Defender.

While Wiz’s models already scan for misconfigurations, behavioural anomalies, and emerging vulnerabilities, their true potential lies in what happens when they’re fused with Google’s broader AI ecosystem. With access to Mandiant’s incident response data and Chronicle’s threat telemetry, this combined stack could deliver the industry’s first truly self-healing security fabric—one that not only flags known risks but anticipates and neutralizes zero-day threats before conventional tools even react. This marks a shift from reactive defense to predictive containment, and most enterprise SOCs simply aren’t built for it.

This is a calculated escalation. It’s also a clear competitive shot across the bow of both AWS and Microsoft. Google is seizing the AI narrative before either rival can operationalize it.

According to the Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 survey, 64% of large enterprises globally say their top cloud security challenge is managing visibility and control across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. A further 49% indicate rising pressure from boards and regulators to consolidate their cloud risk posture into fewer, more accountable partners.

In this context, Wiz isn’t just a smart acquisition—it’s a strategic lodestar. It brings Google closer to high-stakes cloud security decision-making, opens doors in sectors like financial services and healthcare, and reinforces its image as the AI-native Cloud—without demanding full-stack loyalty.

At Greyhound Research, we believe the true value of this acquisition lies not in the USD 500 million ARR Wiz brings today but in the trust to which Google now gains access. This is about being in the room when tomorrow’s enterprise risk architectures are drawn—regardless of who owns the underlying cloud.

Customer Impact – What Changes for Buyers Inside the Ecosystem

Every acquisition requires a product roadmap. But when that roadmap crosses multiple clouds and affects enterprise risk postures, the impact is far deeper than just new features or updated SKUs. Google’s acquisition of Wiz shifts not only the surface layer of security offerings—but also the underlying ownership of trust, accountability, and architectural control.

For Google Cloud customers, the upside is immediate. Wiz will likely be integrated into GCP’s native security stack, giving enterprises access to AI-powered, agentless threat detection baked into their cloud infrastructure. Expect risk remediation, compliance audits, and anomaly detection to increasingly become automated and proactive—without waiting for human intervention. Over time, Google could evolve this into a fully managed security-as-a-service model, one where security operations are orchestrated end-to-end by artificial intelligence.

If integrated to its full potential, Wiz could evolve into the backbone of a self-healing cloud security fabric—one that not only detects anomalies but remediates them automatically, reconfigures access policies, and maintains compliance without human intervention. For CISOs exhausted by alert fatigue and SOC sprawl, this isn’t a futuristic vision—it’s an operational imperative.

This holds particular appeal for overburdened CISOs, especially in regulated industries like finance, pharma, and government, where real-time compliance visibility and fast remediation aren’t just preferences—they’re mandates. One Greyhound Fieldnote captured during an advisory engagement with a CISO at a global insurance firm confirms this. In the CISO’s words, “We’re tired of stitching tools together to meet regulatory expectations. If Wiz can be integrated with GCP’s native stack and automate 80% of our audits, that’s not just a feature—it’s a board-level win.”

However, the changes extend far beyond GCP. Wiz is platform-agnostic. It already runs on AWS, Azure, and Oracle Cloud. That means even enterprises not betting on GCP will now find themselves tethered to Google via security. Companies running multi-cloud strategies can adopt Wiz without friction—but must now reckon with the fact that their security telemetry, anomaly detection, and threat response are increasingly governed by Google’s systems, AI, and strategic roadmap.

But with this acquisition, that neutrality now comes with an asterisk. Customers who deployed Wiz precisely because it worked seamlessly across clouds are now revisiting their assumptions. Will Wiz retain full feature parity across AWS and Azure? Or will the gravitational pull of GCP skew its development roadmap? Greyhound Fieldnotes indicate a spike in RFPs from enterprise clients asking vendors to declare post-acquisition roadmap neutrality in writing—especially in highly regulated sectors where platform drift carries real audit risk.

This has both operational and philosophical implications. Enterprises will need to re-evaluate how much dependency they’re comfortable with, particularly when vendor concentration in security could become a new systemic risk. According to the latest Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 survey, 57% of CIOs and CTOs flagged “vendor consolidation risk in cloud security” as a rising concern, up from 38% just a year ago.

There are also tangible implications for procurement, architecture, and security planning. Procurement heads will need to renegotiate contracts and risk clauses in anticipation of tighter GCP integration. CTOs will need to map out how Wiz’s integration affects existing SIEM, endpoint detection, and compliance frameworks. CISOs will need to assess whether Google’s AI-driven threat models conflict or converge with in-house SOC policies. And CFOs—always lurking—will want to understand how a premium security asset now embedded in GCP pricing structures could shift their total cost of ownership.

Meanwhile, AWS and Microsoft customers face different dilemmas. They can still use Wiz—at least for now—but may find its capabilities increasingly tilted toward GCP. Features like real-time remediation or integrated Mandiant response could remain exclusive to Google environments. AWS users, for instance, will have to continue relying on third-party integrations like Palo Alto Prisma or CrowdStrike Falcon to stitch together similar functionality—at higher operational overheads and costs.

There’s also a financial logic underpinning this move. Wiz’s agentless deployment model means faster time-to-value, lower overhead, and reduced dependence on manually intensive threat-hunting operations. For CFOs and procurement leads, this offers a path to consolidate security spending while simultaneously increasing automation and visibility. But it also means more of that spending flows through Google, blurring traditional boundaries between infrastructure costs and security investment. According to Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025, 46% of enterprises expect their cloud security budgets to converge with infra budgets over the next 18 months.

At Greyhound Research, we believe this acquisition fundamentally shifts the cloud security baseline. It reorients customer expectations from reactive defense to autonomous resilience—and positions Google not merely as a cloud provider but as a default security orchestrator across cloud estates it doesn’t own. For enterprises, this changes the questions they ask during procurement, the metrics they track in their SOCs, and, ultimately, the partners they trust with risk.

Market Impact – What This Signals to the Ecosystem at Large

The cloud security landscape was already a tightrope walk—dominated by a few hyperscalers, dotted with agile startups, and regulated by a chorus of increasingly assertive global authorities. Google’s acquisition of Wiz doesn’t just tilt this balance. It shatters the pole, redraws the wire, and dares everyone else to follow.

For competitors, the message is clear: AI-first, multi cloud-native security is no longer optional. Wiz wasn’t just another startup—it was a category-shaper. By absorbing it, Google has acquired both the intellectual property and the mindshare needed to leapfrog AWS and Microsoft in the one domain neither has fully mastered: autonomous, preemptive, and architecture-agnostic security.

AWS now finds itself vulnerable at the very point it once dominated—customer confidence. Despite having the largest cloud footprint, its native security stack is tightly coupled to the AWS environment, with GuardDuty, Macie, and Security Hub still more reactive than predictive. Unless it makes a counter-acquisition—say, Lacework or Orca Security—it risks appearing complacent in the face of an AI-led security future. Greyhound Fieldnotes with an AWS partner confirm this. In the partner’s words, “This changes how our customers evaluate us. They’re no longer comparing hyperscalers—they’re comparing security futures.”

Microsoft, too, has some catching up to do. Defender for Cloud, while robust within Azure, lacks Wiz’s agentless deployment model and multi-cloud polish. And though Copilot for Security is on the horizon, it is still embryonic. Microsoft must now fast-track its AI roadmap or risk losing the narrative in the only metric that truly matters: enterprise trust.

For the broader ecosystem—partners, ISVs, and even regulators—this is a recalibration moment. Neutrality is under siege. Wiz, once the Switzerland of cloud security, is now flying Google’s flag. Startups that previously integrated with all clouds equally may now fear competitive blowback. Some may flee to Microsoft or AWS. Others may double down on carving out niche adjacencies in posture management, policy automation, or endpoint-SOC orchestration.

This deal doesn’t just pressure hyperscalers—it jolts the mid-market security landscape. Vendors like Lacework, Orca, and Snyk, who once positioned themselves as cloud-agnostic disruptors, must now compete with Google’s newly integrated—and increasingly opinionated—security stack. At Greyhound Research, we believe this move accelerates a shakeout in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP) segment, forcing second-tier players to either verticalise their value or risk getting buried under Google’s scale and AI-led visibility.

This is already triggering ripple effects. According to the Greyhound Ecosystem Pulse 2025 study, 42% of system integrators and 39% of SaaS vendors are now re-evaluating partnerships where platform neutrality was assumed. Many expect tighter bundling, more vendor preference clauses, and a surge in audit and compliance renegotiations.

The regulatory lens, too, is sharpening. With Google’s growing dominance in cloud computing and cloud risk governance, antitrust concerns will inevitably rise. In markets like the EU, India, and Australia—where digital sovereignty is a live wire—regulators may scrutinize how Wiz’s cross-cloud telemetry now feeds back into one centralized provider. This acquisition doesn’t just affect pricing or innovation—it affects jurisdiction, compliance, and systemic trust.

Greyhound Fieldnotes from compliance leads in the EU and APAC confirm that regulatory scrutiny is already intensifying. Many fear that a single hyperscaler owning both infrastructure and the telemetry used to audit it creates a structural conflict of interest. For enterprises operating under GDPR, India’s DPDP Act, or Australia’s Critical Infrastructure obligations, this deal forces a reassessment of who holds operational accountability for security data—and under which jurisdiction.

At Greyhound Research, we believe this move rewrites the definition of ‘standard’ in enterprise security. It challenges the assumption that neutrality equals safety and forces the ecosystem to ask tougher questions: Who owns your telemetry? Who trains your threat models? And what happens when your last line of defense is also your vendor’s competitive wedge?

Enterprise CXO Playbook – Points to Ponder

If you’re on the board or in the leadership suite, here’s what you must confront as cloud security becomes the new theatre of enterprise competition:

1/ Stop Treating Security as a Bolt-On — It’s Now the Architecture. Most enterprises still treat security as a control layer applied after infrastructure decisions. However, with Wiz, Google is embedding security into the very substrate of cloud operations. If your cloud strategy doesn’t start with security as a design principle, you’re building brittle systems. Greyhound Fieldnotes from BFSI CXOs reveal that risk-first architecture is now a board mandate, not an IT preference.

2/Re-evaluate Your Definition of Multi-Cloud – Neutrality Is Now a Mirage. Wiz was once cloud-neutral. No longer. With Google owning the IP, every update and every roadmap decision now serves a platform agenda. CIOs must reassess what “multi-cloud” really means in practice — and whether their posture is truly provider-agnostic or silently consolidating risk. According to Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025, 61% of global enterprises now report concerns about vendor-controlled cross-cloud telemetry.

3/ Understand the Real Cost of AI-Driven Security — It’s Not Just Pricing, It’s Control. AI-led remediation sounds compelling — until your security decisions depend entirely on a vendor’s model. With Google integrating Wiz into its AI ecosystem, CISOs must interrogate where governance ends and black-box automation begins. We’ve seen enterprise clients bypass Google-native tools in sensitive sectors due to a lack of model transparency. If you can’t audit the algorithm, you can’t own the risk.

4/ Prepare for Security Stack Overlap — And Internal Vendor Wars. Wiz overlaps with existing SIEM, CNAPP, and compliance tooling in most enterprises. That means duplication, integration headaches, and political tension between security, infra, and procurement teams. CFOs must brace for renegotiation cycles and internal rationalization battles. Greyhound Fieldnotes show that post-acquisition vendor alignment takes an average of 9–12 months — time enterprises can’t afford to lose in the current threat landscape.

5/ Don’t Wait for AWS and Microsoft to React — Your Architecture Can’t Pause for Strategy. This deal puts Google ahead, but it also forces AWS and Microsoft to respond quickly. Expect copycat acquisitions, bundled security upgrades, and new platform hooks. CTOs must scenario-plan today, not after Ignite or re:Invent. As we’ve seen in past cloud pivots, the lag between announcement and impact is short — but the price of unpreparedness is long-lasting.

6/ Ask Your Vendor About the Exit Plan — Wiz Was Independent. Now, It’s a Strategy Lever. What begins as a best-of-breed tool can quickly become a platform hook. Wiz once promised neutrality and modularity. Now, it’s fused into Google’s broader security and infrastructure play. CIOs must revisit existing contracts and future evaluations with an eye on entanglement—can your current vendor still stand alone, or has it become someone else’s strategic chess piece? At Greyhound Research, we believe exit optionality must now become part of every cloud security due diligence process.

7/ Monitor for Shifting Roadmaps — Your Security Strategy Is Now a Subplot. With Wiz folded into Google’s portfolio, its independent roadmap becomes subject to GCP’s strategic cycles. Greyhound Fieldnotes show that post-acquisition features promised to multi-cloud users often take a backseat to deeper native integration. CIOs must hold vendors accountable for roadmap continuity—and demand transparency in reprioritization decisions.

8/ Reassess Data Flow and Residency — Governance Isn’t Just a Legal Function Anymore. With Wiz’s telemetry now part of Google’s infrastructure, security data flows could cross jurisdictions without triggering alerts inside enterprise governance teams. CISOs and compliance heads must revisit cross-border data contracts—and ensure they align with region-specific mandates like GDPR, DPDP, and Australia’s Critical Infrastructure Act.

9/ Expect Toolchain Simplification Pressure — But Don’t Rush Consolidation. Enterprises will feel pressure—from vendors and boards—to consolidate overlapping security tools. However, simplification done hastily often breaks existing integrations. Greyhound CIO Pulse 2025 shows that rushed toolchain consolidation increases incident resolution time by up to 22%. CTOs must redesign with intent—not urgency.

10/ Rethink Your Metrics — Start Tracking Security Autonomy, Not Just Coverage. Traditional KPIs—alerts closed, coverage achieved—don’t reflect what AI-native security changes. Enterprises must start measuring how often systems self-heal, how few humans are involved in resolution, and how AI recommendations align with SOC response. At Greyhound Research, we believe the next wave of cloud security maturity will be judged by autonomy, not headcount.

11/ Prioritise Developer-First Security Integration — Or Risk Building in Silence. Wiz built its early adoption momentum by embedding security into the developer workflow—not layering it on top. With Google now owning that narrative, CIOs and CTOs must double down on DevSecOps alignment. Greyhound Fieldnotes show that enterprises enabling infrastructure and product teams to evaluate cloud security tools together are more likely to see successful rollout. If your developers don’t trust the tool, it won’t matter who signs the contract.

12/ Interrogate the Integration Ecosystem — WIN May Not Stay Open Forever. Wiz’s Integration Network (WIN) spans over 150 tools today. However, with Google at the helm, enterprises must revalidate the openness of this ecosystem. If key integrations begin prioritizing GCP-native features, existing toolchains may quietly degrade. At Greyhound Research, we believe extensibility is the next vendor control vector—and IT leaders must insist on forward-compatible integration roadmaps before signing off on consolidation plans.

The Strategic Reset

Enterprise trust doesn’t collapse in a breach—it shifts in a buyout. With the acquisition of Wiz, Google hasn’t just bolstered its cloud security capabilities—it’s inserted itself deeper into the bloodstream of enterprise architecture. This is a strategic reset, not just for Google Cloud but for every enterprise drawing up its next-generation digital foundation.

Security is no longer a service wrapped around infrastructure. It is the infrastructure. And by acquiring Wiz, Google has redrawn the edges of control—not through a product pitch, but through platform proximity. The impact will ripple far beyond feature sets. It touches on architecture, telemetry, compliance, and boardroom-level accountability.

At Greyhound Research, we believe this acquisition signals the rise of a new security order—one defined by AI-native controls, cross-cloud intelligence, and fewer degrees of operational freedom. Enterprises must now make decisions not just about which cloud to trust but also about who will govern their risk when their security stack becomes indistinguishable from their infrastructure provider. This is the moment to pause—not for reflection, but for redrafting. Because when your cloud provider starts controlling your defences, you’re no longer just buying capacity. You’re handing over your perimeter. And that changes everything.