US Sanctions On EU: Impacts On Global Tech Compliance

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Prefer watching instead of reading? Watch the video here. Prefer reading instead? Scroll down for the full text. Prefer listening instead? Scroll up for the audio player.

P.S. The video and audio are in sync, so you can switch between them or control playback as needed. Enjoy Greyhound Standpoint insights in the format that suits you best. Join the conversation on social media using #GreyhoundStandpoint.

---

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing sanctions on EU officials responsible for enforcing the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA), a move that could escalate transatlantic tensions and complicate how US enterprises manage compliance, data flows, and operations in Europe.

“Boards are already responding by embedding political risk into contracts, creating redundant cloud architectures, and expanding legal and audit teams,” said Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst and CEO at Greyhound Research. “What was once a routine compliance review has become a standing negotiation between legal, risk, and technology leaders. The operational costs are rising sharply, with compliance headcount and legal fees consuming budgets once earmarked for innovation.”

As quoted in Computer World, in an article authored by Prasanth Aby Thomas published on August 26, 2025.

Beyond the Media Quote: Our View, In Full

Sanctions Escalation and Enterprise Risk in US-EU Tech Relations

Greyhound Standpoint – According to Greyhound Research, the threat of Washington sanctioning EU officials for enforcing the Digital Services Act represents a profound rupture in the foundations of transatlantic digital governance. Sanctions have traditionally been reserved for authoritarian regimes or gross abuses of power — never for allied regulators executing democratically enacted law. If such measures proceed, they would weaponise sanctions as an instrument of regulatory coercion, turning European market access from a rules-based certainty into a volatile geopolitical gamble.

This confrontation is not just about trade; it is also ideological. U.S. policymakers are framing the DSA as a “censorship law” incompatible with the American First Amendment tradition, while European leaders insist that freedom of expression is “at the heart” of the regulation, which targets only illegal content. In this clash, sanctions risk being seen not as protection of enterprise but as an assault on Europe’s sovereign democratic authority.

The consequences for enterprises are severe. European officials have made it clear that retaliation would be inevitable, and the legal scaffolding is already in place. The Anti-Coercion Instrument and Blocking Statute provide Brussels with the power to respond quickly through tariffs, procurement restrictions, or the nullification of extraterritorial measures. U.S. firms would be left navigating irreconcilable demands: loyalty to Washington’s pressure on one side, compliance with Brussels’ penalties on the other. For CIOs and CFOs, this marks the end of predictability in Europe; investments will increasingly be suspended or redirected not on commercial merit but on the fear that geopolitics can overturn legal certainty overnight.

Compliance and Operational Costs for Multinational CIOs

Greyhound Standpoint – According to Greyhound Research, escalating U.S.-EU tensions elevate compliance from a functional requirement into a structural constraint on digital transformation. Enterprises face the real prospect of dual exposure: complying with the DSA risks political backlash in Washington, while failing to comply invites fines of up to six percent of global revenue in Brussels. This is not an incremental burden but a systemic threat that forces compliance to the centre of corporate strategy.

Boards are already responding by embedding political risk into contracts, creating redundant cloud architectures, and expanding legal and audit teams. What was once a routine compliance review has become a standing negotiation between legal, risk, and technology leaders. The operational costs are rising sharply, with compliance headcount and legal fees consuming budgets once earmarked for innovation.

This moment also exposes the precedent risk. By sanctioning regulators, Washington undermines its own long-standing critique of extraterritorial law and invites others — including China or India — to target U.S. officials in kind. Enterprises must therefore prepare for a world where duplicative compliance obligations are not confined to Europe but proliferate across multiple jurisdictions. The commercial fallout is already visible: global rollouts delayed by months, duplicate systems built solely for political compliance, and reputational exposure if firms are seen to side too openly with Washington’s position. Compliance is no longer a cost of doing business; it is a determinant of whether transformation can proceed at all.

Regulatory Splintering and the Global Tech Landscape

Greyhound Standpoint – According to Greyhound Research, sanctions over the Digital Services Act will accelerate the regulatory splintering of the digital economy into competing blocs. Europe is advancing a rights-based model that balances expression with accountability; the United States is defending an absolutist free speech tradition rooted in the First Amendment. By threatening sanctions, Washington is entrenching this divergence, ensuring that enterprises can no longer design for a unified global stack but must adapt to regionally siloed regimes.

This is more than compliance friction — it is the erosion of scale economies. Enterprises are being forced to build duplicate data centres, sovereign cloud environments, and bespoke compliance processes for Europe, Asia, and the U.S. The efficiencies that once justified global cloud adoption are disappearing, replaced by fractured innovation pipelines and higher capital outlays. Civil society voices in Europe are also warning that U.S. pressure undermines the legitimacy of the DSA itself, creating reputational risk for firms that appear complicit in weakening regulatory enforcement.

The diplomatic fallout is equally significant. Tying sanctions to digital policy risks spilling over into trade, defence, and joint research, weakening the very alliance architecture on which enterprises rely for supply chain stability and investment treaties. Normalising sanctions against allied regulators sets a precedent others will follow, eroding predictability in global digital governance. The splinternet is no longer a metaphor — it is an operational reality. Enterprises must recalibrate strategy around fragmentation, treating compliance silos, duplicative infrastructures, and political divergence as the baseline rather than the exception.

Copyright Policy. All content contained on the Greyhound Research website is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or broadcast without the prior written permission of Greyhound Research or, in the case of third-party materials, the prior written consent of the copyright owner of that content. You may not alter, delete, obscure, or conceal any trademark, copyright, or other notice appearing in any Greyhound Research content. We request our readers not to copy Greyhound Research content and not republish or redistribute them (in whole or partially) via emails or republishing them in any media, including websites, newsletters, or intranets. We understand that you may want to share this content with others, so we’ve added tools under each content piece that allow you to share the content. If you have any questions, please get in touch with our Community Relations Team at connect@thofgr.com.